https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1124
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schineller <[email protected]> 2013-10-15 18:43:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Proposal: Only operators currently defined in the spec be used (AND and OR). > Reason - if we open it up to a general "any logical operator" we will have > different interpretations with different notation, rules, and precedence > rendering this very important part of the spec. much less usable for both > human > readers and machine parsers. If we want to expand the definition, it should > be > included in the spec and defined precisely to avoid ambiguity. > > Proposal: parenthesis only be used for compound license statements. Reason - > simplify human readability and machine parsing (note: I don't feel strongly > about the use of parenthesis for a single license id - just putting a "stake > in > the ground") On tech concall today 10/15/2013, Jack Manbeck, Bill Schineller agreed with these two proposals for best practices. (no dissent on the call...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
