Hello,

after converting the U-Boot project to use SPDX meta-tags, we now
started working on another Open Source project; here we face a
somewhat different situation:  a large number of the individual source
files do not contain any per-file license header at all.  Instead,
they rerely on the fact that they inherit the global, project-wide
license as defined in the top level README and COPYING files.

My understanding is that this is technically and legally clean as is.

However, I see a handling problem here:  the conversion of the project
to use SPDX meta-tags will probably be an incremental process, and
there will be some period of time (eventually even a long one) where
still files exist that have not been converted yet.

I would like to define a way to mark such files where implicit
licensing applies, so that we do not have to check these again and
again.

Of course we could insert a license tag corresponding to the actual
project-wide license, but such a modification is considered intrusive
by some of affected people.

I think it would be better (and easier acceptable by the respective
copyright holders) to have some "neutral" SPDX meta-tag that reflects
the fact that this file inherits the project's global license terms.

Would such a meta-tag be acceptable to the SPDX team?

I'm still looking for a good "name" for such a tag; suggestions we
have so far include:

        SPDX-License-Identifier: implicit

        SPDX-License-Identifier: inherit

        SPDX-License-Identifier: none

        SPDX-License-Identifier: -

Suggestions and comments welcome...

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected]
There is a time in the tides of men, Which, taken at its flood, leads
on to success. On the other hand, don't count on it.   - T. K. Lawson
_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech

Reply via email to