Hi Jeremiah,
>________________________________
>
>From: Jeremiah Foster <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 2:41 AM
>Subject: Re: Proposal for SPDX Element Identifier
>On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:08 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi,
> Following up from last week's very sucessful discussions,
>the following proposal has been drafted to review for the element identifiers.
>
>>>
>https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/document/d/1gNtAYs7IhlGE4SWAXUIIWwpZmEvr4Jz9Ep1MNswyWBk/edit#
>
>>>
>Please review and comment in the google doc.
>
>>
>What sort of legal basis is being used for the concept of "copyrightable"? I
>can see why you'd want to have the smallest possible atomic unit for technical
>reasons, but I don't think there is a particularly strong legal basis for
>asserting copyright on a code snippet.
>
>>
>This is being associated with File and Package at this stage which are
>currently copyrightable. There is some discussion on whether we'll be
>including snippets or not (and how - ie. part of file or separate object in
>the modeling).
>
>
>Kate
>
>>
_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
