Sure Gary, I will join the tech call today. Regards, Sameer
Sameer Ahmed | Member of Technical Staff - App | Wind River Tel (510) 749-2339 | Email: [email protected] From: Gary O'Neall [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 9:58 AM To: Ahmed, Sameer; [email protected] Subject: RE: File Dependency types Hi Sameer - will you be able to join the tech call today? I did some analysis on the current use cases and attempted to identify the usage type and relationship types. A few observations: * We don't have a use case for the SourceOffer. I think it is a great use case to add - I can certainly utility in being able to use SPDX documents to track the relationship between a binary file and the required source files needing to be redistributed. * I believe BuildFrom is equivalent to generatedFrom * I believe BuildScript is equivalent to usageType buildTools * Will we still need a MetaFile and SPDXFilerelationship in SPDX 2.0? The package and SPDX document relationships should satisfy this need (I think). Gary From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ahmed, Sameer Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:24 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: File Dependency types Hi: The following are the file dependency types, which can be utilized: * ### BuildFrom * ### BuildScript * ### SPDXFile * ### MetaFile * ### SourceOffer Regards, Sameer Sameer Ahmed | Member of Technical Staff - App | Wind River Tel (510) 749-2339 | Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
