okay.

The additional work leading up to ccfd2c and 707443 shouldn't go to waste - you 
should either push them as 'better-written-branches, or just including the 
listing, in 'git log' form, or better still, in 'git whatchanged' form, among 
the documentation.

I hope you learned a few interesting things about git on the way - being able 
to recover 'lost commits' could be a useful skill; also gain some understanding 
of the use of sha1 checksum to identify commits and their integrity/security 
implications.


------------------------------
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 09:22 BST ahi wrote:

>Head should now be at a8afe54
>
>
>On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Hin-Tak Leung <[email protected]
>> wrote:
>
>>
>> You have made a mistake some where - as well as tried to change things
>> while you restore. You seem to have restored the code to a9c4423 instead of
>> a8afe54, as well as tried to modify a9c4423, so your current head is
>> 707443... your head should be restored to a8afe54, or decendent of it, not
>> anything else. What additional change did you try to make while restoring?
>> a restore is a restore, do not try to make restore=somethingelse. If you
>> need to make further changes, then that's further commits.
>>
>> ===================
>> okay, as far as I see, you haven't been using rebase much until recently,
>> so there are only two possible restoring points -a8afe54 or a9c4423 . Both
>> of them satisfy "git log a8afe54..dc1796075ba452c8e92df5fa252aaaaf91bd
>> 0f9b" and "git log a9c4423..dc1796075ba452c8e92df5fa252aaaaf91b d0f9b"
>> shows nothing.
>> =========================
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 08:31 BST ahi wrote:
>>
>> >​The repo should now be restored to it's previous state.
>> >git log HEAD..dc1796075ba452c8e92df5fa252aaaaf91bd0f9b
>> >shows nothing.​
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Best Regards,
>> >Ahmed
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Best Regards,
>Ahmed

_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech

Reply via email to