https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1292
Bill Schineller <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bschineller@blackducksoftwa | |re.com --- Comment #1 from Bill Schineller <[email protected]> 2015-06-23 15:13:59 UTC --- Hi Kyle. Based on my quick read of your question, and my knowledge of the SPDX specification, I would choose to use the 'conjunctive' license expression, i.e. your option: (BSD-3-Clause AND FB-Patents-2.0) The SPDX spec is all about communicating what's known, license-wise, about some piece of software. I think the conjunctive 'AND' expression communicates that the software is licensed according to whatever terms and conditions are stated in the BSD-3-Clause license AND FB-Patents-2.0 license) I wouldn't use OR because I don't see it as a choice. I wouldn't use WITH because https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/master/PATENTS doesn't seem to be written as an EXCEPTION to another license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
