https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1330

            Bug ID: 1330
           Summary: consider SPDX-License-Expression as an alternate for
                    SPDX-License-Identifier for use source files
           Product: SPDX
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Spec
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]
    Classification: Unclassified

Reconsider the standard key phrase to trigger on for identifying short form 
license identifiers in source files.

SPDX-License-Identifier emerged from the U-Boot project as a way of doing this
about 3 years ago. 

We introduced SPDX license expressions into the specification with 2.0 (ie. 
just this year).    

The precent in the wild is to use SPDX-License-Identifier,   which is
found now in projects beyond U-Boot (ie. poco,  opendataplane, etc.).   
This is what is documented on the WIKI page:
  http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team/SPDX_Meta_Tags
and is currently planned for inclusion as an appendix in 2.1

David Wheeler currently proposes use of expression instead of identifier:
  SPDX-License-Expression:

see his tutorial tutorial at:
  https://github.com/david-a-wheeler/spdx-tutorial/

also see discussion in:
http://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-tech/2015-November/002933.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech

Reply via email to