https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1330
Bug ID: 1330
Summary: consider SPDX-License-Expression as an alternate for
SPDX-License-Identifier for use source files
Product: SPDX
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Spec
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
Classification: Unclassified
Reconsider the standard key phrase to trigger on for identifying short form
license identifiers in source files.
SPDX-License-Identifier emerged from the U-Boot project as a way of doing this
about 3 years ago.
We introduced SPDX license expressions into the specification with 2.0 (ie.
just this year).
The precent in the wild is to use SPDX-License-Identifier, which is
found now in projects beyond U-Boot (ie. poco, opendataplane, etc.).
This is what is documented on the WIKI page:
http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team/SPDX_Meta_Tags
and is currently planned for inclusion as an appendix in 2.1
David Wheeler currently proposes use of expression instead of identifier:
SPDX-License-Expression:
see his tutorial tutorial at:
https://github.com/david-a-wheeler/spdx-tutorial/
also see discussion in:
http://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-tech/2015-November/002933.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech