Few ponderings:

* Is there any leeway for confusion as to what deprecated means with a
license?   I take it to mean 'we, license authors, don't believe it should
be used for new works'.
* Is there a more general notion of guidance here?
 <guidance>deprecated</guidance>  or <guidance>draft</guidance> etc - not
sure if there are other possibilities.
* Sometimes a best practice when deprecating is to point to what folk
should use.  deprecated: Apache 1.1, use-instead: Apache 2.0; might be
worth supporting if the data supports it. The first set of deprecated
licenses I can think of all have successors, but I imagine there will be
ones which don't have a specific successor.

Hen


On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Gary O'Neall <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Greetings all -
>
> I would like to add a mechanism for representing listed licenses that have
> been marked as deprecated in the JSON and RDFa formats for licenses on the
> spdx.org/licenses website.
>
>
>
> My proposal is to add a property "spdx:deprecated" in the RDFa and just
> "deprecated" in the JSON with a boolean value of true or false.  It would
> be treated as optional with a default value of false.
>
>
>
> This should be backwards compatible since it is an addition of an optional
> field.
>
>
>
> Two questions - any objections to this proposal?
>
> - where should we document this? We could add it in the Other License
> Information section (currently number 5), although, I think it would only
> logically apply to the listed license.  We do not have a separate section
> for Other Licensing information".
>
>
>
> Let me know what you think and if you would like to add it to one of the
> future tech calls to discuss.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Gary O'Neall
>
> Principal Consultant
>
> Source Auditor Inc.
>
> Mobile: 408.805.0586
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spdx-tech mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
>
>
_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech

Reply via email to