Kris, 

No worries.

I have moved the joint call with legal and the tech team (at the tech team’s 
usual Tuesday time frame) back a week to Feb 9th as a result.  SPDX-Legal 
should have gotten a revised invite.

Thanks for the update!

Jilayne

> On Jan 31, 2016, at 10:16 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Update (Kris.re)
>   2. Re: Update (Bill Schineller)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:15:25 +0000
> From: Kris.re <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Update
> 
> 
> Hey folks, I've got to lead with an apology - I wasn't able to start in on 
> converting the license data like we spoke about last call until today, and it 
> turns out to be not as "in the bag" as I had hoped, so I'm sorry for the late 
> response. There's just lots of variations, exceptions, and so on to account 
> for. After spending some hours on it, I'm mostly there, but it's still going 
> to need some review and editing after the fact - I'm just trying to find a 
> balance between the amount I can do with code and the amount I can leave up 
> to manual editing. Either way, I don't think I'm going to be complete by the 
> next tech call, so I'm writing to let you know it'll probably be the call 
> after next one that I'll have something completely ready.
> 
> - Kris
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:16:49 +0000
> From: Bill Schineller <[email protected]>
> To: Kris.re <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
>       <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Update
> 

> ok thanks for the heads-up Kris.
> Keep on truckin'
> 
> Bill Schineller
> VP Engineering - KnowledgeBase
> Black Duck Software
> 781-425-4405
> 508-308-5921 (cell)
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> On 1/31/16, 5:15 PM, 
> "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> on 
> behalf of Kris.re" 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> on 
> behalf of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> Hey folks, I?ve got to lead with an apology ? I wasn?t able to start in on 
> converting the license data like we spoke about last call until today, and it 
> turns out to be not as ?in the bag? as I had hoped, so I?m sorry for the late 
> response. There?s just lots of variations, exceptions, and so on to account 
> for. After spending some hours on it, I?m mostly there, but it?s still going 
> to need some review and editing after the fact ? I?m just trying to find a 
> balance between the amount I can do with code and the amount I can leave up 
> to manual editing. Either way, I don?t think I?m going to be complete by the 
> next tech call, so I?m writing to let you know it?ll probably be the call 
> after next one that I?ll have something completely ready.
> 
> - Kris
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spdx-tech mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
> 
> 
> End of Spdx-tech Digest, Vol 62, Issue 11
> *****************************************

_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech

Reply via email to