Hi Yev,
Agree with the concern. We did discuss this at spec review at Linux Con. The general feeling was if we made the change soon, it wouldn't be too impactful. I do plan to retain the old enumeration in the RDF terms as a deprecated term meaning the "same as" the new term. In the SPDX libraries, I plan to handle the situation where the old term is used. Gary From: Yev Bronshteyn [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 1:39 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Gary O'Neall Subject: Re: [Bug 1349] New: Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf Importance: High Gary, This is a breaking change that will make all existing SPDX documents illegal. The doc you generated for the bakeoff uses the URIs from the current anthology, not the current spec. The same is true for every other doc generated with SPDX tools. If anything, it’s the spec needs to be changed. From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 1:43 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [Bug 1349] New: Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf Bug ID 1349 <https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1349> Summary Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf Product SPDX Version 2.1 Hardware All OS All Status NEW Severity normal Priority P2 Component Spec Assignee [email protected] Reporter [email protected] Classification Unclassified To be consistent with the SPDX document Deprecate the original relationship type make equivalent to the new type _____ You are receiving this mail because: * You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
