David A. Wheeler: >>I certainly will distribute the files, and I may very well *want* to state >>that certain files have/don't have certain licenses or exception.
Yev Bronshteyn: > In that case, you don’t need filesAnalyzed = false. You can set it to “true” > or leave it out, specify the files that you’re distributing and whatever > licensing applies. > Are you saying you want to be able to only specify files that are exempt from > the package-level license? I usually want to specify "all files in this package are under license XYZ", but in some cases, I may want to state an exception e.g., "this file is under license (XYZ OR ABC)". I don't see the value of including the filesAnalyzed tag in my use case. I'm not doing "analysis", I am *telling* you what the answer is. Others can later do analysis, using that and other data, if they want to. Since this is human-created, I'm trying to minimize the number of lines. --- David A. Wheeler _______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
