https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1356

Bill Schineller <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bschineller@blackducksoftwa
                   |                            |re.com

--- Comment #1 from Bill Schineller <[email protected]> ---
Decided not to change Spec version 2.1 with respect to mandatory SHA1.

Also at present not adding sha1git as a checksum type in Spec version 2.1

Changing the whole story around checksums is the type of thing we would
consider discussing for an SPDX version 3.0.

(For now we hope to encourage consistent re-usable SPDX documents by sticking
with our current approach of uniquely identifying each file by a SHA1)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech

Reply via email to