My feedback (and feel free to pass this onto their list) would be to ensure they adopt SPDX Expressions ( https://spdx.org/spdx-specification-21-web-version#h.jxpfx0ykyb60) rather than accepting a single SPDX license id (which is often overly simplistic) or an array (which is ambiguous as to whether it means AND or OR). There are a number of parsers out there for this format.
Regards, William Bartholomew On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:33 PM Santiago Torres Arias <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The Arch Linux community recently started a discussion around adopting > SPDX license identifiers to simplify/improve their license handling: > > > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2019-October/029695.html > > I imagine that the SPDX community may be interested in chiming in if > there are any known pitfalls on doing so, or general advice around it. > > Cheers! > -Santiago. > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3787): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/3787 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/36448420/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
