> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 3:43 PM Santiago Torres Arias <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I finally got myself some time to collect some initial topics regarding >> the linking profile for 3.0. I was thinking of adding individual >> threads, but I think that for now maybe we want to make sure we are >> bringing the priority topics forward. Here are the things I was thinking >> of discussing: >> >> 1. The name. I recall integration being suggested by Nisha, and having >> some pushback on linking (as it is reminiscent of http hyperlinking). >> I'm not too against integration profile, I like "artifact flow" but >> that's a mouthful. Ideas welcome! >> > Naming is hard. :-)
> >> 2. The existing overlap with the current relationship property. It feels >> they fill similar roles, yet there are nuances. Here's what I could >> gather: >> >> - Relationships are intended to document *how* artifacts connect to each >> other. I may be missing a little context here so I'd appreciate to >> have more ideas around this. >> >> - ~links~ are intended to provide artifact flow integrity (i.e., to >> ensure these relationships are integral). They also focus on >> authenticating creators and consumers >> > Agree with the general characterization, but since its more than just the transition (artifact flow), but also authenticating creators and consumers - maybe it should just be "integrity" ? > >> 3. If this overlap is taken care of this properly means: >> - not-links could be "secure relationships", which opens the can of >> worm of inheritance vs reference vs contains >> >> - not-links could be a completely different animal (e.g., an >> annotation) and as such we can take the conversation in another >> direction. >> >> I think these are the overarching discussions to have. I believe that >> probably figuring out 2 will set the tone for 3, so we can probably >> start there :) >> >> I hope this helps stirring discussion! >> >> Cheers! >> -Santiago >> >> >> >> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3881): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/3881 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/73362126/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
