Hi William, thanks for this and for all the work here. I've stared at this
for a bit and I don't have any particular comments offhand. All looks good
as far as I'm concerned.

One question I did have: I note the "FromFile" association between Package
and File. Are you thinking that this would replace the existing
PackageFileName property -- so that instead of giving just a file name, it
would be represented by an SPDX identifier for the actual File? That makes
sense to me, just wondering if that was your intent here.

Thanks!
Steve

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 8:24 PM William Bartholomew <[email protected]>
wrote:

> As promised here is a diagram of the current SPDX 3.0 Base design. Couple
> of things to note:
>
> 1. This is a logical not physical diagram, when this is serialized in
> different formats (Tag, RDF, YAML, JSON, etc.) the property names may be
> different.
>
> 2. There are two types of arrows, ones with an empty head are inheritance
> so the class at the tail end inherits all the properties of the class at
> the arrow end, ones with a filled head are associations so these would be a
> property on the class at the tail end.
>
> We can discuss in more detail at the next tech team meeting but feel free
> to send feedback on or off list prior to then.
>
> Thanks,
>
> William Bartholomew
>
> 
>
>

-- 
Steve Winslow
Director of Strategic Programs
The Linux Foundation
[email protected]

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3897): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/3897
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/75737274/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to