+1. Our wheelhouse is to design a document data structure that integrates smoothly with systems that are based on an ontology, not to design the ontology itself.
Dave On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 3:53 AM Alexios Zavras <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Sean, for the very interesting discussion yesterday. > > > > I’d very much like to get it correctly. On the other hand, I’ve started to > think that this is definitely *not* our core work and I’d hate for us to > spend countless amount of hours trying to solve the complicated issues of > identity/email/agent/etc. > > Therefore… instead of us defining classes for all (many) of this stuff, > can we point to some other ontology and use their classes? We are planning > to do so in a number of other cases, anyway – what is “URL”, what is > “String”, etc. > > > > You did mention another comprehensive ontology that already deals with > “Account”, “EmailAddress”, etc. Shouldn’t we simply point to that? > > > > -- zvr > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4066): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4066 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/83401493/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
