*[William] *I'm really not sure where collections are coming into play
here, maybe I'm missing something. SPDX has persistent element ids and we
agree that elements are immutable, packages, collections, relationships,
etc. are all elements therefore are all immutable. However, the graph isn't
immutable, as you add new immutable nodes (just like container image
layers) the end result is different. If I start with a set of elements in
my graph and I add new elements to the graph that give me new facts about
those elements, my understanding changes, the element itself doesn't change
but the "aggregate" result of those elements is different.

I agree with all of that, but I don't understand how collections (the
"elements" or "files" property of a Package element) cannot come into
play.  The graph isn't immutable, understanding changes, new facts can be
added, and when all that happens, the question of "is the file with hash X
a member of the package with hash Y" has to have a definitive answer.  If
the package artifact has Dick's "Product_Version_Timestamp" then the files
in the package are semantically immutable regardless of how they are
represented.  If the package artifact isn't properly versioned, then when a
hash is computed over the Package Element properties (including "files") it
doesn't depend on all of the relationships that reference that package.
 If the Package Element just has a "Product" without a version that depends
on the aggregate "files" result of the graph at a given timestamp, then
isn't that a deficiency in how SPDX Elements describe artifacts?

My main concern is satisfied: Elements are immutable, the graph changes
over time.  I just think that if a Package Element by itself doesn't
capture the graph's aggregate view of the files in a package at a given
point in time as asserted by a given actor (Microsoft should be more
authoritative for the files in Microsoft's packages than Acme), something's
missing.  Without that, the ability to reason about packages is impaired.

Dave


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#4334): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4334
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/88568831/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to