On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:39 PM Steve Winslow <[email protected]> wrote:
> Each SPDX Relationship can also have an optional RelationshipComment field. > So if you're using relationships in this way, you could consider storing the > compiler / build flags in the appropriate RelationshipComment field, so that > they're more specifically tied to the act of compilation that's reflected in > each such relationship. It isn't doing this in Zephyr currently but I could > envision adding something like that. Thanks for pointing out, Steve. It turned out that ORT's SPDX data model was actually lacking the comment property for relationships, but I've added that now [1]. [1] https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort/pull/5138 -- Sebastian Schuberth -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4392): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4392 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/89657927/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
