Hi Rose, hi all, Unless I am mistaken, I do not think the current standard defines a "default-recommended SPDX format".
What is true is that the examples are given first in Tag Value format (and then in RDF). I would recommend to add in the spec the examples in JSON, but also to keep the current examples in Tag Value in RDF formats. Best regards, Marc-Etienne From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Rose Judge via lists.spdx.org Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 1:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [spdx-tech] Proposal to update examples in the spec to JSON Hi All, I won't be able to make next week's SPDX call so I'm hoping start an a-sync discussion here on the mailing list. In the SPDX Implementers call we've discussed moving away from the Tag Value format as the default-recommended SPDX format as it's not as tooling friendly as others SPDX formats like JSON. However, most of the examples in the spec currently are Tag Value or RDF. Would folks here welcome PRs (to be merged AFTER 2.3) that start to migrate the examples in the spec to JSON? I think this would be a real value to tools that are attempting to adopt SPDX as there's no examples for it in the spec currently. Thoughts? Thanks, -Rose -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4553): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4553 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/91510978/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
