Hi, In the SPDX standard, we have several fields for commenting various entities. In the list below, we have cases where delimiting the comment by <text> .. </text> is always mandatory, and cases where it is mandatory only when the comment has multiple lines. This is inconsistent and adds unnecessary complexity to the standard. I would recommend to make <text> .. </text> always mandatory. What do you think? Best regards, Marc-Etienne CreatorComment:
* In tag:value format this is delimited by <text> .. </text> DocumentComment: * In tag:value format this is delimited by <text> .. </text> PackageComment: * In tag:value format multiple lines are delimited by <text>...</text> ExternalRefComment: * In tag:value format this is delimited by <text>...</text> FileComment: * In tag:value format multiple lines are delimited by <text> .. </text> SnippetComment: * In tag:value format multiple lines are delimited by <text> .. </text> LicenseComment: * In tag:value format multiple lines are delimited by <text> .. </text> RelationshipComment: * In tag:value format multiple lines are delimited by <text> .. </text> AnnotationComment: * In tag:value format multiple lines are delimited by <text> .. </text> -- Marc-Etienne Vargenau [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Nokia, Route de Villejust, 91620 NOZAY, FRANCE Mobile: +33 6 24 49 78 68 Senior Specialist Open Source Planned absence: none -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4558): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4558 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/91580438/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
