David, That isn’t my recollection of the conversation. Making it a data type breaks huge functionality that is key to linking SBOMs to other enterprise activities.
Bob Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of David Kemp <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 10:31:42 AM To: SPDX-list <[email protected]> Subject: [EXT] [spdx-tech] Actor datatype Punchlist item: Last week we decided that Actor should have always been a datatype rather than an Element as previously shown on the model diagram. The Actor datatype should label its identifiers without requiring any association with Identity elements. This example File element shows how "creator" looks with "Identifier" having a specified syntax (name, email, uri, ...) and Actor being an Identifier having a specified subject type (person, organization, tool, any): { "id": "urn:acme.dev:artifacts:gnu-coreutils/v9.1/src/du.c", "type": { "file": { "filePurpose": ["APPLICATION", "SOURCE"] } }, "creator": [ {"person": {"email": "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"}} ], "created": "2022-04-05T22:00:00Z", "specVersion": "3.0", "profiles": ["Core", "Software"], "dataLicense": "CC0-1.0" } -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4834): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4834 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/94892579/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
