Eliot,

 

I agree, the BSA letter wasn’t as critical of SBOM as the ITI letter.

 

I’m thinking all of this may be moot now that the State Department Evolve RFP 
removed all doubt about expectations regarding SBOM delivery to the USG. 

 

An SBOM is easy to produce using existing tooling, in many cases. I don’t 
understand the resistance to providing consumers an SBOM so that they can 
monitor for new risk/vulnerabilities.

 

On a side note, the Evolve RFP is confused about what VEX is. This is not 
surprising given the confusing messaging making VEX appear like a CSAF Security 
Advisory, which it is not, according to Thomas Schmidt.

 

 

Thanks,

 

Dick Brooks

  

Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, 

Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership

 

Never trust software, always verify and report! 
<https://reliableenergyanalytics.com/products>  ™

http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com 
<http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com/> 

Email: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 

Tel: +1 978-696-1788

 

From: Eliot Lear <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2022 9:01 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: 'Friedman, Allan' <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad

 

I think there is some confusion about that letter.  Nowhere does it say that 
"SBOM is bad".  The concern is that Congress would specify one way of doing 
things, the military another, and DISA yet a third.  In fact the article 
specifically says:

OMB’s approach reflects a comprehensive government-wide approach that is 
preferable to congressional mandates directed at one agency that risk 
prematurely locking in technical and operational approaches for the foreseeable 
future. Left unchecked, these varying mandates can be expected to conflict in 
design and execution...

In my view, the issue is “when” and “how” not “if”.

Eliot

On 30.11.22 20:35, Dick Brooks wrote:

https://insidecybersecurity.com/share/14118

 

Wow, some people seem to think this “SBOM thing” looks like the birthchild of 
communism and the black plague. 

 

I don’t understand why people are so afraid of SBOM.  It’s just a text file. 
WAZZUP with that. 

 

Allan, looking forward to seeing you on 12/7 at FERC. I filed my testimony 
today which is very supportive of SBOM, as you can imagine.

 

Thanks,

 

Dick Brooks

  

Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, 

Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership

 

Never trust software, always verify and report! 
<https://reliableenergyanalytics.com/products>  ™

http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com 
<http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com/> 

Email: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 

Tel: +1 978-696-1788

 







-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#4870): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4870
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/95469298/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to