Thanks David for the additional info.

 

I was planning allowing the fields of “data types” as objects in RDF triples in 
SPDX 3.0.  The difference between Elements and “data types” was whether URI 
types were required or if the object could be an anonymous/blank node.

 

Is this consistent with the discussion in the Serialization meeting?

 

Gary

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of David 
Kemp
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2023 12:07 PM
To: SPDX-list <[email protected]>
Subject: [spdx-tech] Serialization: Ontologies vs Datatypes

 

At the SPDX Serialisation Meeting 2023-03-16:

Sean presented a deck of slides that he and Alexios had created to explain 
concepts relating to JSON-LD and RDF with regard to SPDX. The presentation 
covered JSON, JSON-LD, context maps and ontologies.


The discussion included Alexios' toy example of Coordinate, and whether it is a 
linked (referenceable) item in an ontology or not.
1) SPDX Element instances are referenceable by SpdxId, an IRI

2) Instances of Datatypes are plain values, they do not have reference IDs

A third option was discussed, whether Coordinate could be an ontological 
element (a subject or object, connected by a predicate in an ontology graph), 
in which case each instance of a Coordinate would need an IRI that is not an 
SpdxId in addition to its value (latitude and longitude).

The case of Central Park was discussed, which would be modeled as a "Place" 
with a name, image, and an ordered list of Coordinates (not a set) that 
establishes its perimeter.  The southeast corner of the park, 5th Avenue and W. 
58th St, has coordinate 40.76376383066618, -73.973564545299.  This instance is 
not an ontological item because it is also on the perimeter of 5th Avenue that 
exists independently of Central Park.  The identical coordinate would have at 
least three different IRIs (as coordinates of one park, two streets, plus 
innumerable people standing on that corner) if it were considered a 
referenceable RDF item.  Therefore it is not, it is just a value.

The SPDX model accurately expresses the semantics of Datatypes: 
CreationInformation, ExternalIdentifier, PositiveIntegerRange, etc, are data 
types:

These types have value-type / struct semantics - equality is determined by 
comparing values and they MUST NOT be referenced by name across documents.


We should add a list (like the boundary of Central Park) that cannot be a set 
to Alexios' toy serialization example, even if SPDX does not have any use cases 
for an ordered list, to ensure that the modeling methodology is complete.







-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#5046): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5046
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/97716744/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to