Hi Sean - and the larger SPDX tech community,
I would like to get your opinion on how we should handle the NoAssertion and None object values for several SPDX properties. The issues are documented in https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/76 and https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/71 There are two (or more) perspectives on this issue. * In RDF - we're using an Individual for None and NoAssertion and including that in the Range for the properties. This has caused some issues, which may be due to using OWL rather than SHACL to describe the restrictions. * In Object Oriented Programming, it is challenging to define subclasses of Element and Licenses (and other types) that include None and NoAssertions. Feel free to update the issues or reply to all in the email. Thanks, Gary ------------------------------------------------- Gary O'Neall Principal Consultant Source Auditor Inc. Mobile: 408.805.0586 Email: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this information. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5080): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5080 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/98312141/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
