For this week's tech call, we would like to finish up on the larger license profile related questions:
* Use relationships instead of properties - align with Security Profiles? see Thomas comment on https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/254 * Update from Friday's meeting on license expression serializations - see decision in issue 372 comment <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/372#issuecomment-1584905970> and pull request 369 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/pull/369> which implements the Friday decision plus all previous tech team decisions on the licensing profile. Steve is only able to join us for the first 15 minutes or so, so I'd like to cover the relationships first then the update since Alexios, David, Max and I can cover the Friday meeting update. The second topic I'd like to take on is the CreationInfo compaction. There are two proposal - it would be great if you could review both proposals before the call: * Sean's proposal for CreationInfo serialization compaction approach: issue #357 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/357> * Proposal for "unbundled" or individual profile to only require CreationInfo when elements are not contained in a bundle: PR #343 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/pull/343> See you online tomorrow, Gary -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5169): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5169 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/99488691/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
