Thanks for clarifying Bob. The Federal Register announcement also contains some 
interesting requests for feedback to some questions the SBOM community has been 
discussing for years:

 

How should SBOMs be collected

from contractors? What specific

protections are necessary for the

information contained within an

SBOM?

* How should the Government think

about the appropriate scope of the

requirement on contractors to provide

SBOMs to ensure appropriate security?

* What challenges will contractors

face in the development of SBOMs?

What challenges are unique to software

resellers? What challenges exist

regarding legacy software?

* What are the appropriate means of

evaluating when an SBOM must be

updated based on changes in a new

build or major release?

* What is the appropriate balance

between the Government and the

contractor, when monitoring SBOMs for

embedded software vulnerabilities as

they are discovered?

 

FYI: IETF SCITT successfully demonstrated one solution for SBOM distribution 
during the Hackathon in July: 

https://energycentral.com/c/iu/international-trust-registry-demonstration-success

 

Thanks,

 

Dick Brooks

  

Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, 

Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership

 

 <https://reliableenergyanalytics.com/products> Never trust software, always 
verify and report! ™

 <http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com/> 
http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com

Email:  <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]

Tel: +1 978-696-1788

 

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Martin, 
Robert A
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 11:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [spdx-tech] Significant announcement from DOD regarding SBOM

 

Hi Dick,

Little clarification - this is a proposed FAR change coming from DoD, GSA, and 
NASA.

If implemented after the public comment period this would be in affect for all 
government procurements in both the military and civilian sides of government.

Comments due 4 December 2023 here 
<http://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FAR-2021-0017-0001> .

Bob

Robert (Bob) Martin
Sr. Software and Supply Chain Assurance Principal Eng.
Cross Cutting Solutions and Innovation Dept
Cyber Solutions Innovation Center
MITRE Labs
MITRE Corporation
781-271-3001o
781-424-4095c

On 10/3/23 11:10 AM, Dick Brooks wrote:

FYI: Today, DoD issued guidance regarding SBOM requirements and vulnerability 
reporting: https: //www. federalregister. 
gov/documents/2023/10/03/2023-21328/federal-acquisition-regulation-cyber-threat-and-incident-reporting-and-information-sharing

FYI: Today, DoD issued guidance regarding SBOM requirements and vulnerability 
reporting:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/10/03/2023-21328/federal-acquisition-regulation-cyber-threat-and-incident-reporting-and-information-sharing

 

 

Thanks,

 

Dick Brooks

  

Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, 

Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership

 

Never trust software, always verify and report! 
<https://reliableenergyanalytics.com/products>  ™

http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com 
<http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com/> 

Email: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 

Tel: +1 978-696-1788

 

 





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#5369): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5369
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/101735802/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to