At the outreach meeting I realized that the "ListedLicense" class should not be instanciated directly. Instead, the existing (the listed) SPDX license should be referenced.
Alexios, you mentioned "NoAssertionLicense" and "NoneLicense" as examples of individuals included in the SPDX model (and I know of "NoAssertionElement" and "NoneElement" in Core). Did you mean to say that the SPDX model should include the list of SPDX licenses as individuals that instantiate the "ListedLicense" class? For example, a package that is licensed using MIT would be documented as: Package instance <from- Relationship instance using "hasDeclaredLicense" -to> the provided "MIT" individual Is that's correct? If so, are there plans to add those individuals to the model? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5687): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5687 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/107734547/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
