On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 at 15:34, Gary O'Neall via lists.spdx.org <gary=
[email protected]> wrote:

> We do have a couple remaining issues for 3.0.1 we need help on:
> https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A3.0.1
>
>
>
> In particular, we need help from contributors to the Build profile to
> resolve issue 919 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/919> and
> contributors to the Lite profile to resolve issue 914
> <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/914>.
>

We also need some thoughts on how to deal with CreationInfo information for
individuals.
It is issue 154 in spec-parser repo:
https://github.com/spdx/spec-parser/pull/154

In particular, there is one requirement about specification version
information for a named individual that we need a solution for.




*> The identifier for the creationInfo needs to be more than simply
"_:CreationInfo". > It needs to be specific to the particular release
(something like ":v3.0.1CreationInfo", > In future versions of SPDX there
may be multiple different predefined named individuals that were defined in
different > releases. Their creationInfo details need to be kept distinct
and integrous.> A future version 3.1.0 would keep the ":v3.0.1CreationInfo"
(and its use within predefined named individuals defined in 3.0.1) and add
a new ":_v3.1.0CreationInfo" to be used by any new predefined named
individuals if there are any added in 3.1.0.*

But with that requirement, does it mean we need to record which version
each named individual got introduced?

See full discussion here:
https://github.com/spdx/spec-parser/pull/154#issuecomment-2484801667

regards,
Art



-- 
The job of a citizen is to keep his mouth open.
-- Günter Grass


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#5790): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5790
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/109646093/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to