Hi Daniel,
Yes indeed, it looks to be really great regarding SPDX relevance to adress and describe large scale situation. I guess you will push some of your recommendation in the Tech/Legal WG to upgrade
http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-license-list-match- guidelines ?

Season's greatings.

Guillaume


Le 27/12/12 20:31, D M German a écrit :
Hi everybody,

This term I taught a course on Intellectual Property and Software
Development. the students were expected to conduct some research as part
of the evaluation. One of them, Trevor Maryka (who I think is also
subscribed to this list) took on the problem of trying to determine how
'variable' are the BSD and the MITs and what this means for their
standardization under SPDX. he makes a set of recommendations to SPDX
(see section 5). I am attaching his paper. It is, in my opinion, very
good news for SPDX.





--
Daniel M. German                  "Beauty is the first test; there is no
                                    permanent place in the world for ugly
    G. H. Hardy ->                  mathematics."
http://turingmachine.org/
http://silvernegative.com/
dmg (at) uvic (dot) ca
replace (at) with @ and (dot) with .


_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx


--
Guillaume ROUSSEAU
CEO, Co-Founder, Antelink
Président, Cofondateur, Antelink

18, rue Yves Toudic, 75010, Paris 10ème, France
http://www.antelink.com/
Office : +33 1 42 39 30 78

_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx

Reply via email to