D’oh! Arrgh! Other grunting noises!

Here is the correct link. Terribly sorry for the confusion/inconvenience.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HTgrEKBlza_U3yZBKpgu9JDYhZkZ6Jbj9jNsmRreCMo/edit



On Aug 4, 2015, at 9:04 AM, Kate Stewart 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Yev,
    The spec you linked to was the one I created for las week's call.
Is there a different document we should be refering to?

Thanks, Kate

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Yev Bronshteyn 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
Here is the spec for the proposed EternalPackage element. While I touch on 
usage in the beginning, I'll discuss some specific use cases in the context of 
SpdxTools on the call.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WfArS8_xR_CQ_5plOOMtj1y9ps5M-gXFjofUBXR8hyE/edit?usp=sharinghttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1WfArS8_xR_CQ_5plOOMtj1y9ps5M-gXFjofUBXR8hyE/edit?usp=sharing

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx



_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx

Reply via email to