No special guest star this month, so plan on a <30minute meeting.

Note: I only just realized that I neglected to publish the minutes from the 
August meeting, so I am including at the bottom.

GENERAL MEETING

Meeting Time: Thurs, Aug 4, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC. 
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html

Conf call dial-in:
Join the call: https://www.uberconference.com/katestewart
Optional dial in number: 877-297-7470
Alternate number: 512-910-4433
No PIN needed

Administrative Agenda
Attendance
Minutes Approval  http://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2016-08-04

Technical Team Report – Kate/Gary

Legal Team Report – Jilayne/Paul

Business Team Report – Jack

Cross Functional Issues – Phil








General Meeting/Minutes/2016-08-04
< General Meeting<http://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting>‎ | 
Minutes<http://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes>
Jump to: navigation, search
•   Attendance: 12
•   Lead by Phil Odence
•   Minutes of July meeting approved

Contents [hide]
          1 Special Guest - Alexios Zavras, Intel
          2 Tech Team Report - Kate
          3 Outreach Team Report - Jack
          4 Legal Team Report - Jilayne
          5 Cross Functional Topics - Phil
          6 Attendees
Special Guest - Alexios Zavras, 
Intel[edit<http://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=General_Meeting/Minutes/2016-08-04&action=edit&section=1>]
•   His role is open source compliance at Intel, based in Munich
•                   Now at open source tech center
•                   Will be talking about his previous role with Intel Mobile 
Comms
•   Mobile Comms
•                   Based in Germany
•                   Germans are very process-oriented, well-documented
•   His role was SW legal compliance.
•                   Ensuring all software legally compliant across all kinds of 
software
•                   They treat all compliance issues as a bug, just like any 
problem in the software
•                   Alexis learned of SPDX and was very pleased and excited 
about it
•                                   Didn’t manage to get everything SPDX based
•                                   Started slowly
•                                   SPDX is very valuable at many levels
•                                                   Even just the license list 
and standard way of expressing was very helpful
•                                                   Quickly standardized on 
SPDX notations and it started appearing in their documentation etc
•                                   Included in training that was mandatory for 
SW devs and later extended to marketing, legal, biz dev
•                                                   Everyone who touches 
software had to take on-line course with a deeper course available for some
•                                   Have developed number of tools, tightly 
coupled with dev environment
•                                                   All developed internally
•                                                   very tightly controlled, eg 
can’t check out code without a ticket
•                                                   Tool chain includes license 
compliance
•                                   Central team provides compliance services 
to dev
•                                                   too much for all devs to 
worry about
•                                                   Fits with org structure
•                                                   Internal teams reviews all 
code
•                                   Started small, then more widespread and 
more automated
•                                                   Today every release goes 
though this license compliance check
•                                                   Requires ‘stamp of 
approval’ from central team
•                                   To make the central team more efficient
•                                                   Save all results
•                                                   Including many of the SPDX 
fields
•                                                   Saved in database
•                                   Last step, not yet taken, is to generate an 
SPDX doc for each release
•                                                   Just held up by 
organizational issues, technically feasible
•                                                   Being worked on
•                                                   Have started getting the 
request from customers
•                                                                   Not 
mentioning SPDX by name, have not seen that yet,
•                                                                   but asking 
for data that SPDX covers, files, license, etc
•                                                                   (both are 
with Euro customers)
•                                   When they generate SPDX
•                                                   Permissive license require 
attribution
•                                                   They’ve had an issue with 
that going back 5 years
•                                                   Their policy to handle is 
to deliver all OSS in source form
•                                                   So, therefore include 
attribution in comments
•                                                   They include a list of open 
source and model licenses, but the attribution is all in source code
•                                   Example- Modem company
•                                                   Intel provides chips and 
software in binary form
•                                                   Packaging: With binary they 
include
•                                                                   all source 
for open source in binary
•                                                                   And, list 
of conditions for any 3td party proprietary code
•                                   Are they being asked for security 
vulnerabilities associated with components
•                                                   Not yet, but they are 
thinking about it with respect to naming (CPEs, etc)
•   AZ- “Thanks for the wonderful work. It’s really helpful.”

Tech Team Report - 
Kate[edit<http://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=General_Meeting/Minutes/2016-08-04&action=edit&section=2>]
•   Spec
•                   Collecting feedback
•                   Addressing as it comes it
•   Gary has taken a pass at updating tools
•   In the polishing stage
•                   One more round of feedback
•                   Into publishing mode as of Tuesday
•   Bake Offs
•                   Possible SF 9/27 and Europe at LCon
•                   Needs to be nailed down in the next couple week.
Outreach Team Report - 
Jack[edit<http://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=General_Meeting/Minutes/2016-08-04&action=edit&section=3>]
•   Website
•                   Still working this week
•                   Will review at next week’s meeting
•                   Should be close with go live; shooting for Linux Con NA
•                   Still looking for some improvements that will require work 
from the Linux Foundation team
•                                   No show stoppers
•                   Will send out link for review
Legal Team Report - 
Jilayne[edit<http://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=General_Meeting/Minutes/2016-08-04&action=edit&section=4>]
•   XML review
•                   Still plugging away
•                   Timeline set
•   2.5 release
•                   Just a few licenses
•                   Aiming for end of Oct
•                   See Legal Team meeting mins for detail
•                   Could use all the help they can get; lots to do
•                                   To review new XML master format for every 
license

Cross Functional Topics - 
Phil[edit<http://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=General_Meeting/Minutes/2016-08-04&action=edit&section=5>]
•   Guest stars
•                   Always looking for more

Attendees[edit<http://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=General_Meeting/Minutes/2016-08-04&action=edit&section=6>]
•   Phil Odence, Black Duck
•   Alexios Zavras, Intel
•   Kate Stewart, Linux Foundation
•   Jilayne Lovejoy, ARM
•   Scott Sterling, Palamida
•   Robin Gandhi, UNO
•   Jack Manbeck, TI
•   Yev Bronshteyn, Black Duck
•   Matt Germonprez, UNO
•   Michael Herzog- nexB
•   Georg Link, UNO
•   Mike Dolan, Linux Foundation
•              NewPP limit report CPU time usage: 0.009 seconds Real time 
usage: 0.011 seconds Preprocessor visited node count: 23/1000000 Preprocessor 
generated node count: 28/1000000 Post‐expand include size: 0/2097152 bytes 
Template argument size: 0/2097152 bytes Highest expansion depth: 2/40 Expensive 
parser function count: 0/100 Saved in parser cache with key 
spdx_mwiki:pcache:idhash:1048-0!*!*!!en!*!* and timestamp 20160830122940 and 
revision id 3956

_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx

Reply via email to