Sorry, all, didn’t mean to cc the list. But you might find my blog amusing as well.
From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Philip Odence <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 6:13 AM To: Kate Stewart <[email protected]>, SPDX-general <[email protected]> Subject: Re: SPDX recommendations from other communities! :-D Wow, Kate, great stuff! Thanks for sharing. I’ll talk to Jack about putting reference on the website. In the meantime, for your amusement: http://blog.blackducksoftware.com/open-source-licenses-interesting From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Kate Stewart <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 5:47 AM To: SPDX-general <[email protected]> Subject: SPDX recommendations from other communities! :-D Hi, Just thought some of you might be interested in some recent announcements with SPDX showing up in them. FSFE<https://fsfe.org/> just launched a new site today recommending use of SPDX license identifiers in the source files, and generating a manifest from an SPDX document. :-) see: https://reuse.software/ Also there are a similar set of recommendations by the Commons Conservancy<https://commonsconservancy.org/> which also recommend use of the tags, and generation of SPDX documents: https://commonsconservancy.org/faq/licenseinfo/ Best regards, Kate
_______________________________________________ Spdx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx
