For those interested -- as a follow-up to Kate's message about the EO, here
is an article in ZDNet that mentions several aspects of SPDX and how it
addresses objectives of the EO:

https://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-and-open-source-communities-rise-to-bidens-cybersecurity-challenge/

Steve

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:36 PM Kate Stewart <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Last night Biden signed Executive Order (EO) on Improving the Nation’s
> Cybersecurity
> <https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/05/12/executive-order-on-improving-the-nations-cybersecurity/>
> .
> As part of this Executive order the concept of SBOM is getting widespread
> visibility.
>
> If the question comes up please help reinforce that *SPDX is a **valid
> recognized SBOM format*.
> NTIA has recognized 3 SBOM formats able to satisfy the minimum viable
> requirement
> <https://www.ntia.gov/files/ntia/publications/sbom_options_and_decision_points_20210427-1.pdf>
> for an SBOM, and SPDX is one of them. Current details are available from
> the last NTIA formats and tooling quarterly checkpoint last month
> <https://www.ntia.gov/files/ntia/publications/ntia_sbom_tooling_2021-q2-checkpoint.pdf>.
> Also, last month NTIA hosted a plugfest, and all but one, tool was able to
> create an SPDX SBOM.
>
> The NTIA community has been key to getting SBOM in this EO.  Some of you
> will remember Allan Friedman from NTIA's presentation to our group last
> year, as well as Ed Heierman from the HealthCare PoC on what they found
> using SPDX, so it's very exciting to see this emerge.
>
> Thanks,
> Kate
>
>
>
> 
>
>

-- 
Steve Winslow
VP, Compliance and Legal
The Linux Foundation
[email protected]


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1404): https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/message/1404
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/82805212/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/leave/2655439/21656/1698928721/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to