Thanks, Sebastian for your thoughts, support and understanding. Regarding licensing, my sense was that your desire to make the spec easy to publish is covered by the proposed licensing scheme. Perhaps you and Steve could discuss to resolve.
Regarding the Code of Conduct. I think we’ve forked it from the upstream with which you are concerned and, in any case, the option to improve upon in the future exists. Best, Phil From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Sebastian Crane <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 1:58 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spdx] SPDX Thursday General Meeting Reminder - SPECIAL MEETING Dear all, During today's General Meeting, in which the Core Team presented a proposal to improve the governance of SPDX, I brought up a few suggestions to the current proposal. Going into the meeting I did not fully grasp that, under the current governance model, the proposal would have to be accepted by the working group as a whole - thus consensus would need to be reached before additional suggestions. Thank you to Steve and Phil for explaining this! I think it would be good to have a discussion at some point on the Code of Conduct and of the licensing of the SPDX specification, to maybe iterate further on the already excellent proposal. For the record, and the reason for sending this email, I wanted to state that I'm very much in support of the proposal as it is now, and would not consider my concerns blockers here! Thanks again to the members of the Core Team who've put the time and effort into creating the proposal. Best wishes, Sebastian -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1432): https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/message/1432 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/85287401/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/leave/2655439/21656/1698928721/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
