Certainly, I have filed it here:
https://github.com/interlynk-io/sbomqs/issues/263 if you wish to follow
along.

Thanks
Surendra

On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 6:24 AM Luis Soeiro via lists.spdx.org <lfl.sb=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Em 2024-06-22 01:11, Surendra Pathak escreveu:
> > We are passionate supporters of the community, and within SPDX, members
> > have done a good job of maintaining ntia-conformance-check, so they
> > should definitely get the credit first.
> Good!
>
> > Our goal with sbomqs has been cross-spec, multi-purpose utility, and we
> > will continue to iterate with new features. Thanks for your support. If
> > you have a feature request, we are all ears.
>
> Well, since you have brought this up... ;-)
>
> There is one command line combination "sbomqs score -b" which is very
> handy to include in batch processing. Under GUN/Linux,
> I can capture its output with result=$(sbomqs score -b) and it includes
> one line. Example:
>
> for file in $files
> do
>    result=$(sbomqs score -b $file)
>    echo "$file,$result" >> results.txt
> done
>
> results.txt:
> sbom.spdx,5.6
> bom.1.2.json,5.6
> xyz,5.6,5.6
>
> However, it would be very nice if there were a way to get more
> information. In addition to the score, there could be a way to also
> return the detected specification standard and the specific format. For
> instance:
> "5.6,spdx,json" or "5.6,cyclonedx,xml"
>
> for file in $files
> do
>    result=$(sbomqs fullrecord -b $file)
>    echo "$file,$result" >> results.txt
> done
>
> results.txt:
> sbom.spdx,5.6,spdx,tag
> bom.1.2.json,5.6,cyclonedx,json
> xyz,5.6,spdx,json
>
> >> I see. Well, if I don't find local CLI tools, I'll try to find a way
> >> to use an online API.
> > If you do consider API route, Interlynk platform is fully accessible
> > via API and supports - assessment, enrichment, vulnerability mapping,
> > lifecycle, automated edits, and a ton more.
> > Our goal has been to take operators' minds off of spec-specific details
> > and more into their use cases - Security, Compliance, or DevOps. I can
> > show it in action if you do go down that route.
>
> I'll keep that in mind, thanks.
>
> Best,
> Luis
>
>
> 
>
>
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1874): https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/message/1874
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/106803276/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/leave/2655439/21656/1698928721/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to