On 25-Sep-06, at 2:59 PM, Johannes Ernst wrote: > I thought we had consensus that Drummond and I owned the > vocabularies/ontologies/schema/whatever-we-call-it action item?
nope > > We've come up with something rather beautiful (I think ;-)) that > avoids a gap between XDI, LID and DIX (or whatever the latter is > called these days) while not re-inventing the vocabulary wheel as > you seem to be proposing. open to other suggestions > > I'm surprised that you are submitting this draft today because I > believe it had been 1) Sxip's view that we don't need a minimal > vocabulary for OpenID 2.0 at all, and 2) it had been the consensus > at our in-person meeting the day before DIDW that this action item > was owned by Drummond and me. nope, we had consensus that you two were going to work with me on it ... happy to hear feedback on what we proposed > > To quote from the meeting notes: > >> * Johannes and Drummond volunteered to start working on a vocabulary >> document for attribute exchange. Dick: do you have something for >> them to >> look at for this? and I posted that we (Sxip) were working on that _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
