On 10/5/06, Dick Hardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you missed my message arguing why it was important and that > being part of the return_to URL made it hard for the functionality to > be contained in the library
I'm not sure I buy this reasoning, since our OpenID 1 libraries add a nonce to the return_to URL (which is not hard, since the library needs to add stuff to the return_to URL anyway) That being said, I think it's a quite reasonable parameter. I just think that this particular argument is bogus. Josh _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
