Graves, Michael wrote:
> I won't delve into where we are with respect to that capability here,
> but want to suggest that maybe as we move to OpenID 2.0, and now offer
> portable IDs (as well as run-time chosen IDs selected at auth-time?), we
> may be wise to just make the jump to using "homesite" and "membersite"
> across the board, rather than "IdP" and "relying party", both of which
> are technically problematic for our framework.

I kinda get "homesite", but I don't understand the thinking behind 
"membersite": What is this site supposed to be a "member" of?


Personally, I quite liked the old OpenID term "consumer". :)

specs mailing list

Reply via email to