> I'd really prefer not to change terminology in the spec right now.
> Seems like something we should have thought about four months ago versus
> a week after we said it would be final.  There is nothing saying user
> friendly terms that map to spec terms can't be created for the time
> being.  I do however think there will need to be healthy discussion
> around them, that takes longer than a week.  :)

+1 to all points.

- Scott

specs mailing list

Reply via email to