+1, though thinking we should define IdP-Specific Identifier and Portable Identifier in the terminology section.
Thanks for doing this! --David -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh Hoyt Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 7:31 PM To: specs@openid.net Subject: Portable Identifier Support Proposal (patch) As requested [1], I have made a patch to the specification [2] that specifies the "two-identifier" mechanism for portable identifier support. It's attached to this message. The net effect is adding one line to the source XML file. I hope this proves useful in evaluating the proposal. Josh 1. http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2006-October/000478.html 2. http://openid.net/svn/listing.php?repname=specifications&rev=70&sc=1 (openid.net specifications svn trunk, revision 70) _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
