Feel free to write a patch for that section. :)
--David
-----Original Message-----
From: Dick Hardt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 06:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
To: Recordon, David
Cc: Josh Hoyt; specs@openid.net
Subject: Re: Re[2]: PROPOSAL: OpenID Form Clarification (A.4)
Missed that section. It is not clear what the return_to URL is though.
The return_to URL may not be the same thing as the action URL from
the login form. What we wanted was the action URL since we want to
POST openid_identifier=<OpenID URI> to that URL. This would be a
different message then the indirect response message from the IdP
which is signed etc.
I think this is the right direction, we just need to clarify more
what that end point is.
-- Dick
On 19-Oct-06, at 11:21 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
> Which is still described in the latest draft, see
> http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-2_0-10.html#anchor42.
>
> --David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Josh Hoyt
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:24 PM
> To: Dick Hardt
> Cc: specs@openid.net
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: PROPOSAL: OpenID Form Clarification (A.4)
>
> On 10/19/06, Dick Hardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I like your proposal. I would tweak the name:
>>
>> <link rel="openid.entry" href="" href="http://my.rp.com/openid/blah.cgi">http://my.rp.com/openid/blah.cgi">
>
> This is what Yadis was designed for. Since OpenID already requires
> Yadis, this should be implemented as a Service entry in the Yadis
> document for any page on which you want that information.
>
> Josh
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs@openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
>
>
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
