Dick Hardt wrote: > > On 7-Nov-06, at 7:59 AM, John Kemp wrote: >> >> I don't believe that trust is a differentiator between SAML >> specifications and OpenID Authentication specifications. >> >> It is AFAICT, in both cases, simply out of scope. > > I should have been more clear, IdP is a Federation term and implies > trust between the IdP and the RP. > That is the definition that many people have about an IdP > Since trust is NOT required between an OP and an RP in OpenID, a > different term helps clarify that important point
I'll quit repeating myself after this go around, but: "It [trust] is AFAICT, in both cases, simply out of scope." Cheers, - John _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
