Recordon, David wrote: > I agree that things like age should be in an extension, though I think > this single piece of data is useful in the core protocol. I'm sure the > exact definition of phishing resistant will come back to bite us in > sometime in the future, but lets deal with it then instead of not adding > anything now. I really like the idea that there be one thing in the > core spec which reaches out to each extension. >
I propose: openid.make_it_work=1 _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
