P.S. I and Hide Nara was talking the other day that it probably would be very useful for the AX to be able to define a "class" of attributes to define a set of attributes.
For example, "Creadit Card" class includes following paramters: 1. FullName 2. Card Number 3. Expire Day 4. Secure digits AX parameters like this: openid.ns.ax = http://openid.net/srv/ax/2.0 openid.ax.class.card = http://visa.com/netcard/1.0 openid.ax.class.card.fullname="Bill Gate" openid.ax.class.card.cardnumber = "4312 4324 5353 1111" openid.ax.class.card.expire = "04/10" openid.ax.class.card.secure="343" Without class paremeter: openid.ns.ax = http://openid.net/srv/ax/2.0 opneid.ax.type.fullname= http://visa.com/netcard/1.0/fullname opneid.ax.type.cardnumber = http://visa.com/netcard/1.0/cardnumber opneid.ax.type.expire = http://visa.com/netcard/1.0/expire opneid.ax.type.code= http://visa.com/netcard/1.0/secure openid.ax.value.fullname="Bill Gate" openid.ax.value.cardnumber = "4312 4324 5353 1111" openid.ax.value.expire = "04/10" openid.ax.value.secure="343" With "class", the message will be shorter, and also will become easier to extract a portion of the attributes in a semantically meaningful collection. We can even go on and sign over only one class etc. Could we add something like this to the scope as well? =nat On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Nat Sakimura <[email protected]> wrote: > I am looking foward to it! > > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Dick Hardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Breno, if you have time to update the proposal per our discussion that >> would be fabulous! >> >> >> On 17-Dec-08, at 5:07 PM, Breno de Medeiros wrote: >> >> We have made significant process in that in-person chat and we need to >>> document this in proposal draft form. >>> >>> I could try and update the proposal for "validate request" which has >>> tentatively been abandoned in terms of allowing meta-data to describe >>> attributes in fetch/store requests. >>> >>> 2008/12/17 Dick Hardt <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> I've been busy with other things. :-) >>>> I had an in person chat with Allen Tom, Eran and Breno about what they >>>> were >>>> thinking of. There was some discussion on the step2 list. >>>> I have a work item to write up the scope so that we can get it started >>>> -- >>>> but have needed to deal with some time critical tasks before I could >>>> start >>>> on it -- sorry. >>>> -- Dick >>>> On 17-Dec-08, at 4:56 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote: >>>> >>>> I am very interested in it, but have not heard about it for sometime. >>>> >>>> What is the status right now? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Nat Sakimura (=nat) >>>> http://www.sakimura.org/en/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> specs mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> specs mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> --Breno >>> >>> +1 (650) 214-1007 desk >>> +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central) >>> MTV-41-3 : 383-A >>> PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7) >>> >> >> > > > -- > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
