Thank you Martin. Yes, that is my intention. (And thank you for a better wording as well!)
It also is going to help preocessing (such as signing) a portion of the document based on the name space. =nat ________________________________________ 差出人: specs-boun...@openid.net [specs-boun...@openid.net] は Martin Atkins [m...@degeneration.co.uk] の代理 送信日時: 2008年12月24日 6:31 CC: OpenID Specs Mailing List 件名: Re: Request for consideration of Working Group Charter Proposal Allen Tom wrote: > Hi Nat - I'm not quite sure what you mean by "class". > Nat previously talked about the idea of bundling several attributes together into a single namespace rather than assigning a URL to each individual scalar attributes. He referred to it as a "class" though you might instead want to think of it as a "struct". As I recall (I can't find the original message right now) the propsal went something like: ns.blah=http://example.com/some-struct blah.field1=xyz blah.field2=abc blah.field3=123 This way the URL is only included once, making the overall message shorter. _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs