+1 On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Dick Hardt <dick.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd prefer to narrow the scope of the WG and keep it focussed on a small > number of goals. > > A separate WG on SREG would be preferred, but I think it is a disservice to > the community to have two specs having such significant overlap. > Choice in this case leads to confusion and reluctance to invest. The > challenge is that those with an investment in SREG now have a propensity to > see it continue on even though intellectually they can see the advantage of > a unified spec. > > fwiw: I am in an off-site most of this week and won't be able to engage > significantly until next week. > > -- Dick > >
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
