If we start the process to form a WG for discovery now, most likely the process would only be completed in 6 months, even if there was considerable agreement and stable technologies to draw from.
Right now, there is quite a bit of momentum and excitement about Webfinger. The XRI TC is hoping to publish draft specs for XRD withing the next 30 days. Concurrently, and in particular after that, it is hoped that progress on webfinger will be speedy. Webfinger spec discussion may take place at either XRI TC or IETF. Should we just start responding to all threads about OpenID 2.x discovery by saying that the discussion is taking place at some other mailing list? On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:36 AM, David Recordon <da...@sixapart.com> wrote: > These questions and the lack of adoption of XRD, site-meta or completion of > WebFinger have all contributed to my belief that we're still just not ready > to redefine how OpenID's discovery process should work. -- --Breno +1 (650) 214-1007 desk +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central) MTV-41-3 : 383-A PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
