are examples normative? If not, is an errata necessary?
Are there any plans for another PAPE version?
paul
John Bradley wrote:
The normative text is correct.
It was always openid.pape.preferred_auth_level_types form Oct 2008
when it was added to draft 5.
The bad example crept in in Draft 6 and went unnoticed.
We will need to figure out a process for errata.
Thanks for picking it up.
John B.
On 17-Jun-09, at 1:03 PM, Allen Tom wrote:
Hi All,
In Section 5.1 of the PAPE Spec, there's a request parameter defined
called
openid.pape.preferred_auth_level_types
however the example in the same section calls it
openid.pape.preferred_auth_levels
Which one is it?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
specs-pape mailing list
specs-p...@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs-pape
_______________________________________________
specs-pape mailing list
specs-p...@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs-pape
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
