I agree- logically you shouldn't, but I know you can. We'll take care of
this for the next release!
-c
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ivanick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: System Property Definitions
Charles Teague wrote:
>
> We definitely figured that you should generally avoid using system
> definitions. We need our own- but the bummer would be if we decided to
> change one so that our internal object using it would get a particular
> behavior- your code could break in scenarios like this. We stop editting
> for the same reason- don't want you to inadvertantly break our objects.
Should we be able to see these in Type Designer when system entities are
not enabled? Logically I would think that we shouldn't, but they are
there.
--
Peter Ivanick
Web Developer
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 215.573.2306 Fax: 215.573.8777
http://www.vet.upenn.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk
or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
