I would defintely take Peter F's suggestion on reading the KB article. As
for TypeIndexAll compared to TypeIndex, I would _only_ use TypeIndexAll if
you want to search over all types. In my current app, this would be a good
idea since I have 4 types and they happen to all be 'content' types. So,
this is something you decide on an app by app basies.
> Specifically, is it better to index using <cfa_TypeIndexAll> to bang out
> all objects in the CODB or to use <cfa_TypeIndex> to hit each type
> individually. My goal of course is to maximize speed and quality of the
> searches. Also, does <cfa_AllTypeSearch> add a noticeable performance
> decrease over <cfa_typeSearch>? Any other verity pitfalls to
> avoid? (Also
> a lot of the content objects types have similarly named
> properties, such as
> Teaser, headline and body. Will this cause any issues with indexing?)
It shouldn't cause any problems.
=======================================================================
Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ UIN : 3679482
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
